The terms ‘setting’ and ‘streaming’ are used to describe a variety of approaches by which learners with similar levels of current attainment are consistently grouped together for lessons.
Learners in different sets or streams sometimes follow a different curriculum, particularly when different national tests, different examination levels or different types of academic and vocational qualifications are available.
The aim of setting and streaming approaches is to enable more effective and efficient teaching by narrowing the range of learner attainment in a class.
In the UK, setting and streaming are more common in secondary school than in primary school.
Although these practices are sometimes described as ‘ability grouping’, we refer here to ‘attainment’ rather than ‘ability’, as schools generally use measures of current performance, rather than measures of ability, to group learners.
Setting and streaming are combined in this Toolkit entry because these practices are usually combined in the evidence reviews on attainment grouping. Both involve regular and consistent grouping of learners into classes based on attainment.
For evidence on the impact of grouping learners by attainment within classes, see the Within-class attainment grouping Toolkit entry. Other types of attainment grouping, such as grouping by attainment across year groups, and teaching high attaining learners with older year groups, are not covered in the Toolkit as they are less commonly used.
On average, learners experiencing setting or streaming make slightly less progress than learners taught in mixed attainment classes.
The evidence suggests that setting and streaming has a very small negative impact for low and mid-range attaining learners, and a very small positive impact for higher attaining learners. There are exceptions to this pattern, with some research studies demonstrating benefits for all learners across the attainment range.
Overall the effects are small, and it appears that setting or streaming is not an effective way to raise attainment for most learners.
Setting or streaming may also have an impact on wider outcomes such as confidence. Some studies from the broader evidence base conclude that grouping learners on the basis of attainment may have longer term negative effects on the attitudes and engagement of low attaining learners, for example, by discouraging the belief that their attainment can be improved through effort.
One of the challenges of attainment grouping is ensuring that learners are correctly allocated to groups. Some studies from the UK suggest that misallocation is a particular problem for learners from disadvantaged backgrounds, who are at greater risk of misallocation to lower attaining groups, and the negative impact which can accompany this.
A recent EEF project aimed to improve outcomes for learners by tackling poor setting practices, including misallocation. The project had no overall impact on attainment, but this appeared to be largely because it was a challenge for schools to change their setting practices.
The evidence on setting and streaming has accumulated over at least 50 years and there are a large number of experimental studies. The conclusions on the impact of setting and streaming are relatively consistent across different evidence reviews. However, most of the reviews present relatively basic analysis. They do not explore whether effects vary between different types of study and different interventions and the evidence base would benefit from new reviews which address these issues in more depth. Overall, the evidence is rated as limited.
The majority of the experimental evidence comes from the USA, and there are few rigorous experimental studies from other countries.
There is more evidence from secondary schools than primary schools, as setting and streaming are more commonly used for older learners.
A large correlational study in the UK found disadvantaged learners are likely to do relatively worse when in sets organised by attainment.
Setting and streaming are organisational strategies that have few associated financial costs. Additional expenditure may be needed if setting or streaming results in greater numbers of classes or requires additional resources for different groups. Overall the costs are estimated as very low.
Have you considered alternative approaches to tailoring teaching and learning? One to one and small group tuition are targeted interventions which have positive impacts on attainment.
How will you ensure that your setting or streaming approach enables more effective teaching for all learners, including lower attaining learners? Which groups will your most experienced teachers be allocated to?
How will you ensure that all learners follow a challenging curriculum, including lower attaining learners?
How will you minimise the risk of allocating learners to the wrong group? Have you assessed whether your grouping criteria could disadvantage certain learners? For younger children, have you taken their relative age within the year group into account?
How flexible are your grouping arrangements? Learners progress at different rates and so regular monitoring and assessment is important to minimise misallocation and ensure challenge for all learners.
How will you monitor the impact of setting or streaming on learner engagement and attitudes to learning, particularly for lower attaining learners?